- Joined
- Sep 19, 2018
- Messages
- 4,117
- SL Rez
- 2002
- Joined SLU
- Nov 2003
- SLU Posts
- 35836
The weird obsession the GOP has with her is really creepy:
Cuz those politicians don't dance and if they don't dance they won't get my vote next time.
Yeah Anonymous seems to have fallen on hard times these days. I realize anybody who wants to can create a social media account claiming to represent "Anonymous" in some capacity; but it seems all the people who actually do that these days tend to push kooky BS with it.
I think it's widely believed by cyber security people that state sponsored hackers have claimed to be Anonymous at different times. I kind of doubt that there ever was one group of "Anonymous" for any length of time. And I kooky political fanatics like feeling like secret agents.Yeah Anonymous seems to have fallen on hard times these days. I realize anybody who wants to can create a social media account claiming to represent "Anonymous" in some capacity; but it seems all the people who actually do that these days tend to push kooky BS with it.
My possibly incorrect assumption is those who claim to be part of Anonymous have usually been loosely connected posters in 4chan. That would be like me claiming to be part of the (evil ) group, VVO'ers.I kind of doubt that there ever was one group of "Anonymous" for any length of time.
Real poor people do not use monikers, but if they do they stick to more ethnic-sounding ones because well that's the rule.Because, obviously, Sandy isn't a logical nickname for 'Alexandria'?!
The person was claiming to represent Q I guess? Their twitter username was anonymousq1776. It does not make a lot of sense that they wanted to tie the two together as Q ir wacko right wing and anonymous is usually leftist (or non-political sometimes).I wonder how accurate is the reply. Have the US right-wing (e.g, Fox or conservative columnists) attacked her over it, or just the anonymous account that tweeted it?