The Israeli Goverment Has Become The Monster

GoblinCampFollower

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
5,314
SL Rez
2007
Not just US right-wing nutjobs, but also EU right-wing nutjobs and the UK "Labour".
Yeah, in the USA, republicans are mostly united behind hating Muslims and giving Israel anything it wants. Democrats are sharply divided on it. Our best hope for a rational candidate will of course be a democrat, but I'm worried the ticket will be between two candidates who both want to give Israel anything and everything.
 

Cristiano

Cosmos Betraying Fiend
Admin
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
5,916
SL Rez
2002
Joined SLU
Nov 2003
SLU Posts
35836
This sort of shit is what Israel's ideology, the colonialist project built on ethnoreligious supremacy known as Zionism (opposition to which makes you antisemitic), has normalised and encouraged. But it's antisemitic to denounce this and demand accountability and justice.

Yes, if you oppose Zionism, you are anti-semitic. Fuck that. It is a lazy argument, as always. If not thinking an ethno-religious state is entitled to grab whatever land they want and murder whomever they want because they are "the chosen people" makes you anti-semitic, so be it.
 

Mona Eberhardt

M-Doll 0809A
Joined
Feb 3, 2021
Messages
363
Location
Hic et Nunc
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
Dec. 26, 2012
SLU Posts
400
Nigel Farage has a long and well-documented history of legitimate antisemitic comments. Yet, Israel's supporters - especially the stealthier ones, the ones that pretend to be benign and "moderate" (as if there's ever been anything moderate in supporting genocidal, racist states) - choose to smear the likes of Zack Polanski (who is Jewish) and the Left as "antisemitic" because they oppose genocide. Speaks volumes.
As a matter of fact, the reason why Israel's cheerleaders (including the "benign" ones that belatedly acknowledge Bibi as a vile politician, while whitewashing the vast majority of the Knesset, which is pretty much as genocidal as he is) smear the Left as "antisemitic" while giving Garage, a legit antisemite, a free pass is that he doesn't oppose this genocide. Their hypocrisy would be comical if it didn't reveal how vile and depraved they really are - they don't flag actual antisemites as such when they, driven by their islamophobia and racism, support the genocidal regime, but they scream "antisemitism" at the Left for opposing genocide.
 
Last edited:

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
23,805
SLU Posts
18459
Yes, if you oppose Zionism, you are anti-semitic. Fuck that. It is a lazy argument, as always. If not thinking an ethno-religious state is entitled to grab whatever land they want and murder whomever they want because they are "the chosen people" makes you anti-semitic, so be it.
What do you call a belief in a "two state solution" (other, perhaps, than "over optimistic at present") -- that is, the belief supported by numerous votes at the UN and by most of the international community that there should be two states, one Palestinian and one Jewish, on the territory of what was once "Mandatory Palestine" under British rule?

Is that Zionism in the sense that it accepts that there should be a Jewish-majority state of Israel occupying some of the territory of the old British mandate?

A lot of discussion about Israel and the Palestinians is, I think, hampered by framing it in terms of irreconcilable demands adopted by the most extreme far-right parties on both sides.
 

GoblinCampFollower

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
5,314
SL Rez
2007
What do you call a belief in a "two state solution" (other, perhaps, than "over optimistic at present") -- that is, the belief supported by numerous votes at the UN and by most of the international community that there should be two states, one Palestinian and one Jewish, on the territory of what was once "Mandatory Palestine" under British rule?

Is that Zionism in the sense that it accepts that there should be a Jewish-majority state of Israel occupying some of the territory of the old British mandate?

A lot of discussion about Israel and the Palestinians is, I think, hampered by framing it in terms of irreconcilable demands adopted by the most extreme far-right parties on both sides.
I can't speak for Cris of course but to me there are two SHARPLY different definitions of "Zionism" that are both used by many people with the wrong expectation that they'll be understood.

1) One meaning is just that the Jewish state should exist.

2) The other meaning that many use now is radical ethno-nationalist movement.

I think most reasonable people support number 1, but are very weary of number 2. ...now.... the tricky part is that I think some proponents of number 2 will swap to number 1 in in a sort of motte and bailey defense when challenged.

I think Israel has the right to exist, but maybe needs a big anti propaganda deprogramming. ....so does Russia and the USA for that matter.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: Innula Zenovka

Ellie

Heretical Raccoon Skunk with a Rainbow Pootbeam
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
809
Location
Ring Of Fire
SL Rez
2009
Joined SLU
Sep 2010
SLU Posts
1882
All that matters now is stopping the Israeli slaughter, genocide & land grabs, all part of the "Greater Israel" plan.

A halt to US funding & all inflows of cash from outside Israel (ban it for supporting terrorist/genocidal activities) would be a good start.

To simplyfy things, I divide Zionists into two categories: those who support genocide, murder & land grabs, and those who don't.

Expect more false flag operations.

Confidential intelligence agency reports may show the car bombing of Jewish targets in London six years ago was part of a secret "tit for tat" war between Israel and Iran and had nothing to do with two Palestinian students convicted at the Old Bailey, the court of appeal heard yesterday.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/oct/25/israel?CMP=gu_com
 

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
23,805
SLU Posts
18459
All that matters now is stopping the Israeli slaughter, genocide & land grabs, all part of the "Greater Israel" plan.

A halt to US funding & all inflows of cash from outside Israel (ban it for supporting terrorist/genocidal activities) would be a good start.

To simplyfy things, I divide Zionists into two categories: those who support genocide, murder & land grabs, and those who don't.

Expect more false flag operations.


https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/oct/25/israel?CMP=gu_com
That article is more than 25 years old. If I properly understand it, and the Wikipedia article about the incident to which the appeal relates, the appellants argued that the jury that convicted them weren't invited to consider evidence to the effect the bombing may have been the work of the Iranian security services. I don't quite see the point you're trying to make with it.

 
  • 1Thanks
Reactions: GoblinCampFollower

GoblinCampFollower

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
5,314
SL Rez
2007
All that matters now is stopping the Israeli slaughter, genocide & land grabs, all part of the "Greater Israel" plan.
Agreed. I just want to stop the slaughter. I'm less interested in the much more complex argument around conquered versus stolen versus indigenous lands... I've heard people say that ALL "Colonial" lands should be returned but actually enforcing that idea would be completely impossible.
 

GoblinCampFollower

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
5,314
SL Rez
2007
I think another response to that question was to call them out on how it's a motte and bailey defense. Wanting them to stop the genocide is a different debate than right to exist. I've noticed many people with bad political takes will try to completely change the subject to something they feel they can "Win."
 
  • 1Agree
Reactions: Mona Eberhardt

Beebo Brink

Climate Apocalypse Alarmist
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
7,042
SL Rez
2006
As a citizen of the U.S., I have no standing to debate Israel's "right to exist" given that I'm living on stolen land. No one debates our right to be here anymore, or at least any more as an open case. It's a moot point now. We're here. We're obviously not going to leave. We don't (currently) treat First Nations people as badly as the Israeli's treat the Palestinians, but it's a low bar and not something to be proud of.
 

Cristiano

Cosmos Betraying Fiend
Admin
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
5,916
SL Rez
2002
Joined SLU
Nov 2003
SLU Posts
35836
As a citizen of the U.S., I have no standing to debate Israel's "right to exist" given that I'm living on stolen land. No one debates our right to be here anymore, or at least any more as an open case. It's a moot point now. We're here. We're obviously not going to leave. We don't (currently) treat First Nations people as badly as the Israeli's treat the Palestinians, but it's a low bar and not something to be proud of.
That is always such a gotcha deflection they use to shut down criticism. Does Israel have a right to exist? Well, again, it is on stolen land. However, yes, they should be allowed to be there. My issue is how abysmally they have treated the Palestinians, culminating in the horrors of Gaza. They have been an occupied apartheid state for far too long. The US is complicit in letting it continue, as are other countries. Israel has certainly ceded any supposed moral high ground. If the tables were turned and it were the Palestinians (and also the Lebanese) treating Israel the same way, there would be international outcry. I am not sure why Israel gets a pass, but it is an abject moral failure and a humanitarian disaster of the highest order. What is happening on a daily basis is a complete horror that I have trouble even processing.
 

Bartholomew Gallacher

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
6,848
SL Rez
2002
If you want to understand the Palestines better you should watch the 2005 movie "Paradise now." This movie by Palestinian director Hanyu Abu-Assad shows how two Palestinian friends become suicide attackers. Original language is Arabic.

It was nominated for Oscar in 2006 as foreign film, but didn't make it. It one a Golden Globe in 2006 though.

 
Last edited:

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
23,805
SLU Posts
18459
That is always such a gotcha deflection they use to shut down criticism. Does Israel have a right to exist? Well, again, it is on stolen land. However, yes, they should be allowed to be there. My issue is how abysmally they have treated the Palestinians, culminating in the horrors of Gaza. They have been an occupied apartheid state for far too long. The US is complicit in letting it continue, as are other countries. Israel has certainly ceded any supposed moral high ground. If the tables were turned and it was the Palestinians (and also the Lebanese) treating Israel the same way, there would be international outcry. I am not sure why Israel gets a pass, but it is an abject moral failure and a humanitarian disaster of the highest order. What is happening on a daily basis is a complete horror that I have trouble even processing.
Does Israel "get a pass," though? More so than the KSA or some of the other Gulf states? There are plenty of other territories artificially created by the former colonial powers during the last century ithat have pretty appalling records but the western press hardly pays them any attention. Are you particularly well-up on what's happening in Sudan and Ethiopia, or the Central African Republic, or Myanmar? I'm not. (Before anyone objects, I'm not saying "What about..?" I'm simply contrasting the amount of media coverage and political attention that events in various countries receive -- simply by reading the mainstream British press I'm considerably better informed about politics in Israel than I am about politics in Belgium or Finland).

Apart from its strategic significance, along with the KSA, as a regional superpower and client state of the US, I think one reason Israel plays such a large role in the consciousness of both Christian-majority and Muslim-majority countries is that Jerusalem and the Holy Land in general play such a large part in the historical and religious imagination of both groups (crusaders seem to mean a lot to the US Christian right when they're not cosplaying in their imaginations as ancient Israelites, and Blake's Jerusalem is pretty much my country's unofficial national anthem) and that both Christianity and Islam have had complicated and problematic (to say the least) relationships with Jews since both newer religions first started.

I don't know enough about Islam to comment, but both European Christianity and (since the Enlightenment) secular European discourse have been obsessed with Jews and Israel, on and off, for over 1000 years. Given that history it's hardly surprising that Israel features largely in current consciousness, particularly since there's a very large constituency in the US that seems to see the US as some form of Biblical Israel.