- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 21,520

- SLU Posts
- 18459

‘Profound shame’: C of E review uncovers 400 new cases of abuse
Inquiry examines records going back to the 1940s and finds culture of deference, victim-blaming and misogyny
Not the opposite of spam, that's for sure.Opposite of what?
For decades, Catholic priests, brothers and sisters raped or molested Native American children who were taken from their homes by the U.S. government and forced to live at remote boarding schools, a Post investigation found.
He being a Jesuit brother who raped Jay when he was 11.“He said if I ever told anybody that I would go to hell,” Jay recalled.
From 1819 to 1969, tens of thousands of children were sent to more than 500 boarding schools across the country, the majority run or funded by the U.S. government. Children were stripped of their names, their long hair was cut, and they were beaten for speaking their languages, leaving deep emotional scars on Native American families and communities. By 1900, 1 out of 5 Native American school-age children attended a boarding school. At least 80 of the schools were operated by the Catholic Church or its religious affiliates.
![]()
John Smyth: Welby ‘failed to act properly over Church’s most prolific abuser’
Victims of John Smyth, who subjected boys to ‘brutal and horrific’ abuse at Christian camps he ran, called for the Archbishop of Canterbury’s resignationwww.thetimes.com
Ah yes, the usual thoughts and prayers for the victims."I’ve given it a lot of thought. I’ve taken advice as recently as this morning from senior colleagues and no, I’m not going to resign for this."
It's difficult to escape the conclusion that Smyth enjoyed the support of very senior evangelical ministers in the Church of England, including the penultimate Archbishop of Canterbury, George Carey, as well as the current incumbent, Justin Welby (the post traditionally alternates between evangelicals and more mainstream Anglicans).Ah yes, the usual thoughts and prayers for the victims.
It's usually either support or clumsy attempts at damage control because protecting the reputation of the church is of superseding importance.It's difficult to escape the conclusion that Smyth enjoyed the support of very senior evangelical ministers in the Church of England, including the penultimate Archbishop of Canterbury, George Carey, as well as the current incumbent, Justin Welby (the post traditionally alternates between evangelicals and more mainstream Anglicans).
Damage limitation, to my mind, would have involved quietly dropping support for his Christian camps without publicising the reasons. That didn't happen and, in fact, Welby continued to support his camps after he'd moved to Zimbabwe and then South Africa. I think they just didn't want to know about it, because they couldn't admit to themselves there was any damage to control.It's usually either support or clumsy attempts at damage control because protecting the reputation of the church is of superseding importance.
I suspect it has to do more with seeking a sense of community than anything 'faith' related. Networking, similar income kids/parents to team up with. Folks are still recovering from lockdown isolation, and probably fed up with their own independent efforts not panning out.I've read recently that the Catholic church is growing again, which kind of surprised me. I've heard several reasons, but my own thinking is some rebound from the clergy sex abuse scandals no longer being as prominent, a search for traditionalism, and maybe, just a slight move away from evangelicalism and from the kind of churches which are more "lifestyle centric" with juice bars.
Still confused about this.
His refusal to step down caused such public outrage, both in the CofE and beyond, that it rapidly became clear his position was untenable, particularly since he'd already said he'd be retiring in January.lol, so "no I'm not going to resign over this" lasted about four days.