Have you ever had any luck in getting people out of that mode? How did you do it? The way *I* got out of some of that mode was the fact that as a gay man, I was getting targeted by the traditionalism, as well as I've always been a neophile. But what of those who will never be targeted by that? The people who fit the white, straight, male, cisgender, Christian demographic? How will those people get out of it?
To define a few terms: Anti SJW people are usually the only ones who ever use the phrase "Social Justice Warrior" non ironically.
SJW is a silly, derogatory term for feminists, and people who believe in white privilege along with LGBT rights.
I think anti SJW can be sub divided into two categories that have a little overlap:
1) Traditionalists. They oppose trans rights because they think it offends god and what not. They usually also favor "traditional gender roles." Traditionalists can be hard to reach and seem to be outside the scope of what you're talking about.
2) Edgy, contrarian atheists. This is the group I think you are talking about. I believe a high percentage of these people will grow out of it and become liberals.
I believe the second group is usually just rebelling against what they are told and what they think is the popular sentiment among their peers. I have a place in my heart for these people, because I was one during puberty. I grew out of it.
This is one of my favorite bodies of research for demonstrating white privilege in a quantifiable sense. What makes this study so persuasive is because they are controlling for the crime committed, which makes it much harder to make the "this one person deserved it because X."
Another topic that comes up when discussing crime and punishment is poverty. Many liberals feel content citing wealth disparities but this isn't very persuasive. Young conservatives will dismiss this argument and if they feel brave, just come out and say that they deserve their poverty.
This is why I think it's very useful to give very specific examples of the systemic racism that worsened the problem. The Greenwood race riots seem to be an effective thing to talk about. It's well known and accepted, even among conservatives, that race riots would deliberately destroy black owned businesses at least as recently as the 1960's on a large scale. The New Deal and Great Society programs deliberately subsidized white owned businesses above their black competitors.
Conservatives like to say that freed slaves had plenty of time to pick themselves up, but it's easy to point to examples of how entire generations of black people who tried to do everything right, just got knocked back down.
Most conservatives know this, but kind of dismiss it as ancient history. It's important to point out that the 1960's are not ancient history. Even if we agree that all systemic racism stopped after 1970 (note that I"m not saying that, it's just for the sake of discussion), the fact remains that many survivors of that evil are still around.
Wealth, connections, education, knowledge of career development and so forth build up over generations. It's extremely naive to think that young black people should have already recovered from what was done to their parents and grandparents, and not just distant ancestors.
This is already a long winded post, and I didn't have a chance to say much about women and LGBT folk. There are a lot of key similarities and differences between how different groups were marginalized across generations. If you are open to learning one, you can learn the others.