Social Media and the state

Veritable Quandry

Specializing in derails and train wrecks.
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
4,793
Location
Columbus, OH
SL Rez
2010
Joined SLU
20something
SLU Posts
42
I'm somehow making a point with this. I just don't know what that point is right now.
That Mel Gibson would probably call him sugar tits?
 
Last edited:
  • 1ROFL
Reactions: Isabeau

Khamon

Folk Harpist
Joined
Sep 23, 2018
Messages
2,869
Location
Alabama
SL Rez
2003
Joined SLU
2007
That Mel Gibson could take him down in one round?

(although I doubt that is true today)
 

detrius

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
2,008
Location
Land of bread, beer and BMW.
Joined SLU
09-30-2007
SLU Posts
10065
...

...

...

...No, that's not it.
That "sugar mountain" looked huge, but all it took was Trump pissing all over him and now he's melting away?
 
  • 1Doge
Reactions: Free

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
21,828
SLU Posts
18459

Bartholomew Gallacher

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
6,111
SL Rez
2002
Perhaps encrypted email, but I think it is a pretty safe bet that the NSA has backdoors to a lot of cryptography systems. One history I read said they exerted considerable pressure on Whitfield-Diffie et. al. to build a backdoor into the first PKC system for them, and I assume that has continued. I know Apple has the rep of being "uncrackable", but the NSA wouldn't tip that they have that backdoor, too, to help some local police force bust a drug dealer. It was the same deal when we cracked Enigma -- we pretty much had to hold off using the intel we got until having the Nazis know that we were reading their mail was less valuable than the strategic value of that intel.
Encryption, if done correctly, works fine. This is why the NSA always tried to corrupt it with backdoors or work around it.

And especially regarding email there is PGP, which is the grandfather of end to end encryption done by the client side. If done correctly, this is unbreakable for the NSA.

The drawback is that doing it is not exactly user friendly, which is why so many people are not using it, because it would mean exchanging key finger prints and giving them trust to validate them.

And even if done perfect, the workaround would be e.g. installing a keylogger on one side and try to grab the password...
 

Noodles

The sequel will probably be better.
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
4,847
Location
Illinois
SL Rez
2006
Joined SLU
04-28-2010
SLU Posts
6947
Encryption, if done correctly, works fine. This is why the NSA always tried to corrupt it with backdoors or work around it.

And especially regarding email there is PGP, which is the grandfather of end to end encryption done by the client side. If done correctly, this is unbreakable for the NSA.

The drawback is that doing it is not exactly user friendly, which is why so many people are not using it, because it would mean exchanging key finger prints and giving them trust to validate them.

And even if done perfect, the workaround would be e.g. installing a keylogger on one side and try to grab the password...
The key is "when done properly".

Which also changes over time.

Which also doesn't exist over time unfortunately, because at this point they are just storing massive piles of data and waiting for computing to get faster to turn that "Billion years to brute force" into "5 minutes to brute force."

Honestly, if they really wanted to reduce time to brute force, it would probably be faster to study "random" key generation mechanisms, and probably reduce the number of actually used keys down to a tiny fraction of the total possible. Because randomness in computing generally isn't nearly as random as we ever want it to be.
 

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
21,828
SLU Posts
18459

Evernote Link

Until recently, Russia was the most important state seeking to undermine European institutions. Vladimir Putin has long disliked the EU because it restricts Russian companies’ ability to intimidate and bribe European political leaders and companies, and because the EU is larger and more powerful than Russia, whereas European countries on their own are not. Now a group of American oligarchs also want to undermine European institutions, because they don’t want to be regulated—and they may have the American president on their side. Quite soon, the European Union, along with Great Britain and other democracies around the world, might find that they have to choose between their alliance with the United States and their ability to run their own elections and select their own leaders without the pressure of aggressive outside manipulation. Ironically, countries, such as Brazil, that don’t have the same deep military, economic, and cultural ties to the U.S. may find it easier to maintain the sovereignty of their political systems and the transparency of their information ecosystems than Europeans.
A crunch point is imminent, when the European Commission finally concludes a year-long investigation into X. Tellingly, two people who have advised the commission on this investigation would talk with me only off the record, because the potential for reprisals against them and their organizations—whether it be online trolling and harassment or lawsuits—is too great. Still, both advisers said that the commission has the power to protect Europe’s sovereignty, and to force the platforms to be more transparent. “The commission should look at the raft of laws and rules it has available and see how they can be applied,” one of them told me, “always remembering that this is not about taking action against a person’s voice. This is the commission saying that everyone’s voice should be equal.”
 

Kamilah Hauptmann

Shitpost Sommelier
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
14,292
Location
Cat Country (Can't Stop Here)
SL Rez
2005
Joined SLU
Reluctantly
Sometimes it seems the Trump administration, with its ill-conceived trade war and wild threats to annex Canada, is being run less with the aim of achieving realistic policy goals than with the intention of outraging normies. The weird fringes have taken over the centre. Meaningless transgression is now the official policy of the United States.
Radical right’s mission is to wind up liberals

Paywall blaster: https://archive.is/IdQ7k
 

Noodles

The sequel will probably be better.
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
4,847
Location
Illinois
SL Rez
2006
Joined SLU
04-28-2010
SLU Posts
6947
I think a lot of it is this weird trollish nonsense, but some of it, especially right after the election, was a push to try to justify their own behavior and beliefs.

There is a weird underlying belief that "The Left" is "just as bad". I think a lot of them, for example, were really upset that there wasn't a bunch of violent outrage and cries of voter fraud after the election, since you know, that's how they do it. They scream and get loud about lies. But they also have been told that "the other side is just as bad."