- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 20,396
- SLU Posts
- 18459
The issue seems to be that there's insufficient research data about sycamore DNA, as opposed to human DNA, to make it useful evidence in court. If the prosecution tries to rely on evidence derived from traces of tree DNA found on the chainsaw, the forensic expert who produces that evidence will have to explain why the jury can be sure the DNA is that of a sycamore and, if they can be sure of that, how this proves the chainsaw was used to cut down that particular sycamore rather than any other sycamore in the area.
The Times article to which I linked says
I didn’t cut down the Sycamore Gap tree — a murderer would get less hassle
“Whoever has done it is going to get ten years for a tree,” Walter Renwick said in the dim light of his ramshackle camper van. The farmer and former lumberj
www.thetimes.co.uk
More background
Sycamore Gap tree investigation: Walter Renwick released on bail
A former lumberjack who was arrested in connection with the felling of the Sycamore Gap tree has been released on bail and declared his innocence.Walter Renwick
www.thetimes.co.uk
Evernote link
Evernote link