Nobody Cares: PRS

Free

Antifa-tigued
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
14,712
Location
Four Seasons Total Landscaping
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565
Exclusive: U.S. Investigators Were Told to Take 'No Further Action' on Caterpillar, Ex-Client of Barr
Before William Barr became President Donald Trump’s choice to lead the U.S. Department of Justice, he represented Caterpillar Inc, a Fortune 100 company, in a federal criminal investigation by the department.

Much was at stake for Caterpillar: Since 2018, the Internal Revenue Service has been demanding $2.3 billion in payments from the company in connection with the tax matters under criminal investigation. The company is contesting that finding.

A week after Barr was nominated for the job of attorney general, Justice officials in Washington told the investigative team in the active criminal probe of Caterpillar to take “no further action” in the case, according to an email written by one of the agents and reviewed by Reuters.

The decision, the email said, came from the Justice Department’s Tax Division and the office of the deputy attorney general, who was then Rod Rosenstein.
It just goes on and on and on.
 

Jolene Benoir

Hello World
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
2,042
Location
Minnesnowta
SL Rez
2007
Joined SLU
Dec 2010

Kamilah Hauptmann

A bit of a wanker
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
7,379
Location
Cat Country (Can't Stop Here)
SL Rez
2002

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
9,529
SLU Posts
18459

The outgoing Trump administration’s final days at the United Nations have resulted in a deepening of US isolation on social and health issues, with only a handful of allies including Russia, Belarus and Syria.

In one vote this week, the US was entirely alone in backing its own amendment to a seemingly uncontroversial resolution about efforts to treat medical complications from childbirth. It called for the removal of references to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the UN Population Fund.

No other nation agreed, with 153 voting against the amendment and 11 abstaining.

A UN diplomat said the spectacle of a western ally and a superpower so totally isolated was “staggering”
 

Jolene Benoir

Hello World
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
2,042
Location
Minnesnowta
SL Rez
2007
Joined SLU
Dec 2010

Sure, just as we head into winter. Icicles, anyone?

On a more serious note, I wonder if this didn't have something to do with the fact that they were ticketing homeless women (the Park Board relocated homeless folks to city parks this last summer) who fell afoul of their ordinance.
 
  • 1Interesting
Reactions: Free

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
9,529
SLU Posts
18459

Bartholomew Gallacher

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
2,638
SL Rez
2002
Apple customers are using goods which could be partly produced by Uyghur forced labor in China... don't believe it?

The US congress right now is discussing the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, which would hold US companies accountable for Uyghur forced labor. Which big tech company opposes it right now and is lobbying against it? APPLE!

 

Kamilah Hauptmann

A bit of a wanker
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
7,379
Location
Cat Country (Can't Stop Here)
SL Rez
2002
Some companies have lobbied to have their names removed from the bill, these people say, because it calls out specific brands like Patagonia, Coca-Cola and Costco, for allegedly using forced labor from the region.
And more!
 
  • 1Thanks
Reactions: Jolene Benoir

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
9,529
SLU Posts
18459
Apple customers are using goods which could be partly produced by Uyghur forced labor in China... don't believe it?

The US congress right now is discussing the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, which would hold US companies accountable for Uyghur forced labor. Which big tech company opposes it right now and is lobbying against it? APPLE!

And NHS staff in the UK (and possibly elsewhere, too?), it seems

 

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
9,529
SLU Posts
18459

The whole occasion seems to have been pretty bizarre, with (almost) everyone participating by means of a pre-recorded speech on Zoom.

Presumably they'll get down to the serious stuff in private chats.
 
  • 1Thanks
Reactions: Jolene Benoir

Kamilah Hauptmann

A bit of a wanker
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
7,379
Location
Cat Country (Can't Stop Here)
SL Rez
2002
Remembering what Bronxelf said about the narcissist's three main modes.
-Raging

-Self Pity

And this one right here:


The whole occasion seems to have been pretty bizarre, with (almost) everyone participating by means of a pre-recorded speech on Zoom.

Presumably they'll get down to the serious stuff in private chats.
-Stepford, where he's ready to be a good little moppet and play nice with everyone, until someone says "no" and then we're back to the other two.
 

Dakota Tebaldi

Well-known member
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
4,632
Location
Gulf Coast, USA
Joined SLU
02-22-2008
SLU Posts
16791
You know - weird moment, I'm actually fine with this.

It seems like the case was merely frozen, not dismissed or dropped. And, in a case where the federal government is suing a company and the company's defense counsel is suddenly nommed to be the US Attorney-General, that's just bound to poison the case with so many conflicts of interest.

For instance, if the government proceeds and then loses the lawsuit, it just looks too much like the new AG purposely tanked the case as a favor to his former client, which is corruption. On the other hand, if the government proceeds and wins the lawsuit or forces a settlement, it risks looking like the new AG might have used or passed along to the government privileged information he possessed as the defendant's former counsel, which is a criminal ethical breach.

So it might honestly be better to just put the case on ice until Barr is out of office, which will be soon now.
 

Veritable Quandry

Specializing in derails and train wrecks.
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
1,972
Location
Columbus, OH
SL Rez
2010
Joined SLU
20something
SLU Posts
42
You know - weird moment, I'm actually fine with this.

It seems like the case was merely frozen, not dismissed or dropped. And, in a case where the federal government is suing a company and the company's defense counsel is suddenly nommed to be the US Attorney-General, that's just bound to poison the case with so many conflicts of interest.

For instance, if the government proceeds and then loses the lawsuit, it just looks too much like the new AG purposely tanked the case as a favor to his former client, which is corruption. On the other hand, if the government proceeds and wins the lawsuit or forces a settlement, it risks looking like the new AG might have used or passed along to the government privileged information he possessed as the defendant's former counsel, which is a criminal ethical breach.

So it might honestly be better to just put the case on ice until Barr is out of office, which will be soon now.
As long as there is no issue with the statute of limitations.