Yay! Nobody Cares about Tickle Me Elmo Musk

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
21,040
SLU Posts
18459
At what point UK just block Xitter from the country?
He's probably so upset because the relevant sections of the Online Safety Act 2023 (passed, that is, by the previous Conservative government) will come into force, subject to parliamentary approval, on March 25 this year. At this point OFCOM, the independent regulator, will be able to fine companies large amounts and, in extreme cases, block them from the UK altogether, if they fail to remove various types of illegal or harmful content, so things could start to become rather expensive for Twitter X if Mr Free Speech Absolutist doesn't take steps to comply with UK law.

 

Noodles

☑️
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
4,278
Location
Illinois
SL Rez
2006
Joined SLU
04-28-2010
SLU Posts
6947
He's probably so upset because the relevant sections of the Online Safety Act 2023 (passed, that is, by the previous Conservative government) will come into force, subject to parliamentary approval, on March 25 this year. At this point OFCOM, the independent regulator, will be able to fine companies large amounts and, in extreme cases, block them from the UK altogether, if they fail to remove various types of illegal or harmful content, so things could start to become rather expensive for Twitter X if Mr Free Speech Absolutist doesn't take steps to comply with UK law.

I don't know what he is worried about, Twitter is all "the truth" plus he asked really nicely for people to post more productive content!
 

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
21,040
SLU Posts
18459


ETA

 
Last edited:

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
21,040
SLU Posts
18459
Dropping this in here for background


Wikipedia Rochdale Child Sexual Abuse Ring

I'd add that a major contributory factor was that, at the time of the initial investigation, the Crown Prosecution Service guidance (issued before Keir Starmer took over) told prosecutors to consider the chances of obtaining a conviction when deciding whether or not to prosecute, which meant in sexual abuse cases prosecutors and police took into account how credible they thought juries might find the complainant's evidence. Because of the various victims' troubled backgrounds, the police and CPS initially thought juries probably wouldn't believe them, so the prosecutions were never brought.

Starmer changed the guidance to stress that the more serious the allegation, the greater the public interest was that the matter be decided by a jury rather than behind closed doors by prosecutors and that the investigation should focus more on the credibility of the allegations as a whole rather than the credibility of individual witnesses. This means, in effect, that a prosecution should be brought if the complainant's allegations disclose sexual abuse, and it's up to the jury to decide whether or not they are persuaded to the criminal standard that the allegations are true.

The downside of this is that a lot of cases of sexual assault are now brought that don't have much chance of success -- I remember one I was involved in where a crack addict accused her pimp and dealer of rape, and his defence was that it was consensual and she was retaliating because he wouldn't give her some crack for free, in which I was pretty sure I believed her, but could not in good faith have said I was sure his account was not true -- but I still think it's better that a jury decide that than the police or the prosecutors.

Certainly, though, Starmer can't be blamed for Rochdale -- he helped clear up a mess he'd inherited.

ETA: The Times (no friend of the Labour Party) gives the history


Evernote Link
 
Last edited:

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
21,040
SLU Posts
18459

Free

Improving on Cam's avatar since 2025.
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
35,609
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
21,040
SLU Posts
18459
He's probably so upset because the relevant sections of the Online Safety Act 2023 (passed, that is, by the previous Conservative government) will come into force, subject to parliamentary approval, on March 25 this year. At this point OFCOM, the independent regulator, will be able to fine companies large amounts and, in extreme cases, block them from the UK altogether, if they fail to remove various types of illegal or harmful content, so things could start to become rather expensive for Twitter X if Mr Free Speech Absolutist doesn't take steps to comply with UK law.

Thread here has some details of how things might work out, if the regulators decide to play tough

 

Noodles

☑️
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
4,278
Location
Illinois
SL Rez
2006
Joined SLU
04-28-2010
SLU Posts
6947
Whats with this weird obsession with conquoring countries and making them states?

Its like these Nationalist idiots realized how fucking stupid Nationalism is and instead of accepting it, they want to Nationalize Globalism, because they spent too much effort telling everyone "Globalism Bad" and can't ever admit they are stupid and wrong.
 
  • 1Agree
Reactions: Katheryne Helendale

Free

Improving on Cam's avatar since 2025.
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
35,609
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565
/me glances at thread title.

:coffee:


EDIT: Posted for a previous comment that's since been removed. But I'm leaving it for enigmatic purposes...
 
Last edited:
  • 1Beer
Reactions: CronoCloud Creeggan

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
21,040
SLU Posts
18459
Whats with this weird obsession with conquoring countries and making them states?

Its like these Nationalist idiots realized how fucking stupid Nationalism is and instead of accepting it, they want to Nationalize Globalism, because they spent too much effort telling everyone "Globalism Bad" and can't ever admit they are stupid and wrong.
No, I think they're simply emulating other oligarchies run by autocrats. Putin wants Ukraine so he invades the country. Xi wants Taiwan and, on Trump's watch he'll probably invade too.

Trump/MAGA don't want to stand up to them, so they'll act as they see the autocrats acting, threatening to invade Panama and Mexico, joking about annexing Canada and the UK, and making noises about buying Greenland, to prove they're hard cases, too.

It's all of a parcel with Trump's Godfather act and his successful businessman act. A weak autocrat's idea of how a strongman dictator behaves.
 
Last edited:

Bartholomew Gallacher

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
5,669
SL Rez
2002
Outstanding achievement of Elon Musk: Russian troll botnet Matryoshka migrating from X to Blusky on its own!

How comes? "This trend has been driven largely by Donald Trump’s victory in the U.S. presidential election and Elon Musk’s controversial “reforms” that introduced unpopular changes to the platform he now owns. "

So in other words X is now such a shithole by itself, that Russian trolls are not necessary any longer to spread the FUD and propaganda Moscow wants to see!

 
  • 1Facepalm
Reactions: Beebo Brink

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
21,040
SLU Posts
18459
Jess Phillips, the UK's safeguarding minister whom Musk has called a "rape genocide apologist," reponds


Interview on which the story is based (don't know if it's available outside the UK)

Jess Phillips: Musk's criticism of me is 'ridiculous' but it is turning my world 'upside down' - Latest From ITV News

Also


In a wide-ranging interview, he criticised the “relentless attacks” on mainstream media by Elon Musk, the world’s richest man and owner of X, whose claims about grooming have reignited the scandal this week.

“The truth is a concept that Elon Musk clearly has very little interest in,” said Norfolk, emphasising that the grooming was only exposed through his years of painstaking reporting in The Times, during which he had the full support of its editors.
Evernote Link
 
Last edited:

Jopsy Pendragon

Year of the Schadenfreude Overdose
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
2,384
Location
San Diego CA
SL Rez
2004
Joined SLU
2007
SLU Posts
11308
America should grant statehood to Puerto Rico and Washington before it starts annexing new territories.
Neither are conservative enough for the Republicans to "give" them two senators and have many representatives, and democratic leadership knows that they can't help them without giving something up in return.. and failing to help either d.c. or Puerto Rico will just drive token across the aisle.

I can't see either party taking ratification seriously, not until something makes it immediately beneficial to both parties
 
  • 1Agree
Reactions: CronoCloud Creeggan

Noodles

☑️
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
4,278
Location
Illinois
SL Rez
2006
Joined SLU
04-28-2010
SLU Posts
6947
Neither are conservative enough for the Republicans to "give" them two senators and have many representatives, and democratic leadership knows that they can't help them without giving something up in return.. and failing to help either d.c. or Puerto Rico will just drive token across the aisle.

I can't see either party taking ratification seriously, not until something makes it immediately beneficial to both parties
Do Republicans really think Canada or Greenland are Conservative enough? Of the 4 choices here, I want to say I have heard Puerto Rico is pretty conservative, probably more than Greenland and Canada, primarily due to religeon.
 
  • 1* Popcorn *
Reactions: Kamilah Hauptmann