This, from
May 20, may explain the latest turn of events.
Essentially, the High Court
granted Assange leave to appeal against the deportation order on the grounds that the US government was either unable or unwilling to confirm that he would, as a non-citizen, be able to rely upon the same First Amendment protections as would a US citizen accused of the same offence.
In British extradition law, there's a general ban on extradition in cases where the defendant will be at a disadvantage because of their nationality and also in cases where their rights under the European Convention on Human Rights would be compromised (in this case, freedom of expression, if he couldn't rely on First Amendment protections).
Confronted with the very real possibility that the extradition request would finally be refused by the British courts for reasons that would not reflect well on the US Justice Dept, it may well be that the US decided this has all gone on long enough and threw in their hand.
The High Court judgment makes clear that, had the US prosecutors been prepared to give assurances they wouldn't seek to argue in court that Assange was unable to rely on the same constitutional protections as a US citizen, they'd have allowed the extradition request. These two matters were the only remaining obstacles.
Neutral Citation Number: [2024] EWHC 700 (Admin)Case Number: AC-2022-LON-001745 and 1746 In The High Court Of JusticeKing’s Bench DivisionDivisional Court 26 March 2024 Before:President of the King’s Bench Division and Mr Justice Johnson Between:Julian Paul Assange-v-Government of the United...
www.judiciary.uk