LOL! Julian Assange makes a list of what he doesn't want said about him

[Romana]

So that model citizen the WikiLeaks paedo rapist had his staff draw up a massive list of what can't be said about him and then expects his orders it not be published be respected: The Complete List of 140 Things You Can’t Say About Assange or WikiLeaks – Emma Best
Needless to say he's trending on Twitter, and not in a good way...

 

[Innula Zenovka]

I'm particularly puzzled by this one:

It is false and defamatory to suggest that "Tommy Robinson" ever took a photo on the steps of the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

The only person who can possibly be defamed by that, it seems to me, is the far right agitator Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (alias Tommy Robinson), and the only way in which it can be defamatory is if the court-- rather improbably, to my mind -- is persuaded to the civil standard that the allegation he took a photo from that position is likely to bring upon him the hatred, ridicule or contempt of right-minded people who read it.

I see we are also told that

It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange has ever tortured a cat or dog.

However, nothing is said about his possible proclivities for firestarting and persistent bed-wetting.

Is this omission significant? The public has a right to know!

 

[danielravennest]

Ars Technica has an article about this, along with a photo of Assange describing a woman's "huuge tracts of land":

(It's not defamatory, I have photographic evidence).

 

[Chin Rey]

Apparently it is not false or defamatory to suggest Julian Assagne is a dirty, rotten, arrogant bastard that is so full of himself he couldn't care less about how much he hurt others.

 

[HEX]

SAD LITTLE BAD SMELLING BOY WHO LIVES UNDER THE STAIRS OF THE ECUADOR EMBASSY IN LONDON MUST BE SO UPSET THIS LEAKED SO FAST BUT HE HAD TO KNOW IT WOULD HAPPEN!!!!

 

[Essence Lumin]

I would have thought someone who depends on the media like he does would know better than to make a list like that. “Confidential legal communication. Not for publication.” - Who would know that disclaimer wouldn't work.

 

[RyanSchultz]

You know what? I care so little about Julian Assange that I couldn't even be bothered to read through his list.

If you want an interesting read on Assange, pick up a copy of The Secret Life: Three True Stories of the Digital Age, by Andrew O'Hagan, who was originally hired by him to ghost-write a book about him. Really eye-opening look.

 

[Free]

I suddenly want a children's story about a boy named Julian who lives under the stairs.

</repost>

 

[Noodles]

Free has the best user icon.

 

[Kara Spengler]

Time to googlebomb some things ...

 

[Kara Spengler]

I would have thought someone who depends on the media like he does would know better than to make a list like that. “Confidential legal communication. Not for publication.” - Who would know that disclaimer wouldn't work.

"What? Someone leaked information about a site that prides itself on leaks? Who would DO such a thing??????"

 

[Kara Spengler]

Hmm, there was one that they had nothing to do with pizzagate. Their site has a page on it.