- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 6,990
- SL Rez
- 2006
Senate Votes To Cut Federal Funding To Public Broadcasting
The vast majority of PBS programming (at least in my area) is British-centric. There are a smattering of shows from Western Europe (Professor T, Luna + Sophie, Seaside Hotel), but overall, the offerings from comedy to drama to reality shows are imported from Great Britain. Meanwhile, there is virtually no representation from Africa, Asia, the Middle East, or Latin America. Finding Your Roots -- which is probably the most quintessentially American show on offer -- is an anomaly. And then there is Nova, which is absolutely splendid, but like Roots, a blip on the menu.
Honestly, I'm hard-pressed to justify the federal funding of PBS given their priorities. Either they are a show about the American people, which means a focus on this country, or they are a lens to our origins, in which case they should present a wide selection of programming from across the world. And if they can't afford more than a few programs like Roots and Nova, and their only option is to re-package British shows, are they really a viable venture?
Personally, I'd hate to lose PBS (I'm a long-time supporter), especially to the GOP's war on "left-leaning" culture. I would, however, like some serious reflections on what PBS is doing and why, because more and more I find myself questioning what purpose they serve that can't be answered by a subscription to BritBox.
I've been following these stories with interest (and dread), but also some mixed feelings specifically about PBS. Although the news of funding treats this as a single issue, the roles of PBS and NPR -- especially at a local level -- are quite different. NPR stations really do support the local news and provide a necessary service to their community; PBS, on the other hand, not so much.The Senate passed Donald Trump‘s set of spending cuts to rescind $1.1 billion from public media, despite warnings that the funding rollbacks will devastate the PBS, NPR and public station ecosystem.
The vast majority of PBS programming (at least in my area) is British-centric. There are a smattering of shows from Western Europe (Professor T, Luna + Sophie, Seaside Hotel), but overall, the offerings from comedy to drama to reality shows are imported from Great Britain. Meanwhile, there is virtually no representation from Africa, Asia, the Middle East, or Latin America. Finding Your Roots -- which is probably the most quintessentially American show on offer -- is an anomaly. And then there is Nova, which is absolutely splendid, but like Roots, a blip on the menu.
Honestly, I'm hard-pressed to justify the federal funding of PBS given their priorities. Either they are a show about the American people, which means a focus on this country, or they are a lens to our origins, in which case they should present a wide selection of programming from across the world. And if they can't afford more than a few programs like Roots and Nova, and their only option is to re-package British shows, are they really a viable venture?
Personally, I'd hate to lose PBS (I'm a long-time supporter), especially to the GOP's war on "left-leaning" culture. I would, however, like some serious reflections on what PBS is doing and why, because more and more I find myself questioning what purpose they serve that can't be answered by a subscription to BritBox.






