Brexit.

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
21,817
SLU Posts
18459
In somewhat recent years, the UK seems more and more to have a miniature version of many of the bad qualities of the US.
Since 2010, successive governments have pursued a policy of "austerity" -- cuts in public spending -- which has meant, since governments have tried, to a greater or lesser extent, to protect spending on electorally sensitive areas, particularly the Health Service, welfare and education, other services have had to cope with huge cuts in real-terms funding. The problem has been particularly acute for the prison service, which has to cope with an ever-increasing prison population, caused primarily by government's desire to appear tough on crime by legislating to increase the guideline sentences for particular offences, combined with an aging prison estate, with many prisons dating from Victorian times.

I suspect they're floating this idea not because it's seriously being considered --there is, after all, no reason to expect that prison officers anywhere in Europe other than the Republic of Ireland would be fluent in English, it would make education and training while in prison very difficult for similar reasons, and it would make it very difficult for family members to visit inmates -- but in order to prepare public opinion for the most likely, though politically unpalatable, remedy of an early release scheme for more minor offenders.
 
  • 1Thanks
Reactions: Essence Lumin

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
21,817
SLU Posts
18459
  • 1Like
Reactions: Govi

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
21,817
SLU Posts
18459
Since 2010, successive governments have pursued a policy of "austerity" -- cuts in public spending -- which has meant, since governments have tried, to a greater or lesser extent, to protect spending on electorally sensitive areas, particularly the Health Service, welfare and education, other services have had to cope with huge cuts in real-terms funding. The problem has been particularly acute for the prison service, which has to cope with an ever-increasing prison population, caused primarily by government's desire to appear tough on crime by legislating to increase the guideline sentences for particular offences, combined with an aging prison estate, with many prisons dating from Victorian times.

I suspect they're floating this idea not because it's seriously being considered --there is, after all, no reason to expect that prison officers anywhere in Europe other than the Republic of Ireland would be fluent in English, it would make education and training while in prison very difficult for similar reasons, and it would make it very difficult for family members to visit inmates -- but in order to prepare public opinion for the most likely, though politically unpalatable, remedy of an early release scheme for more minor offenders.
And so it happens ...


It's not quite as bad as the headline makes it sound, since it seems judges are being asked to delay sentencing hearings rather than to abandon sentencing guidelines altogether. Normally, a defendant convicted of rape who has been on bail during their trial might reasonably expect, all things being equal, to be granted limited bail until the sentencing hearing, generally held 4 to 6 weeks after the trial ends. So it just means that, in most cases, the convicted rapist will enjoy a few more weeks' freedom rather than escape prison completely.

The real story, I think, is buried in the middle of the article

The Times also understands, from crown court judges who have been issued with the guidance, that as soon as next week some prisoners will also be released early under proposals from justice ministers.
I don't actually have a problem with that, since one reason our prisons are so full is that English courts sentence far more harshly than do most other countries in Europe. However, that's because successive governments have taken the easy option, when confronted with public disquiet over crime rates, of promising to be "tough on crime" by increasing sentences, generally without any evidence that this is any sort of solution at all, let alone a cost-effective one, but not doing anything to increase the number of cells available to accommodate the larger number of inmates that is the inevitable result of such a policy.

"We'll crack down on crime by handing down longer prison sentences. Oh dear. We've run out of space. I know, let's release some prisoners early, to make room for the new ones."

Evernote link
 
  • 1Thanks
Reactions: Govi
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
6,446
Location
NJ suburb of Philadelphia
SL Rez
2003
SLU Posts
4494
"We'll crack down on crime by handing down longer prison sentences. Oh dear. We've run out of space. I know, let's release some prisoners early, to make room for the new ones."

Evernote link
The American way is to say fuck it, we'll just stack them in on top of each other and who cares if they die.
 
  • 1Agree
Reactions: Beebo Brink

Sid

I never said that.
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
6,849
And so it happens ...


It's not quite as bad as the headline makes it sound, since it seems judges are being asked to delay sentencing hearings rather than to abandon sentencing guidelines altogether. Normally, a defendant convicted of rape who has been on bail during their trial might reasonably expect, all things being equal, to be granted limited bail until the sentencing hearing, generally held 4 to 6 weeks after the trial ends. So it just means that, in most cases, the convicted rapist will enjoy a few more weeks' freedom rather than escape prison completely.

The real story, I think, is buried in the middle of the article



I don't actually have a problem with that, since one reason our prisons are so full is that English courts sentence far more harshly than do most other countries in Europe. However, that's because successive governments have taken the easy option, when confronted with public disquiet over crime rates, of promising to be "tough on crime" by increasing sentences, generally without any evidence that this is any sort of solution at all, let alone a cost-effective one, but not doing anything to increase the number of cells available to accommodate the larger number of inmates that is the inevitable result of such a policy.

"We'll crack down on crime by handing down longer prison sentences. Oh dear. We've run out of space. I know, let's release some prisoners early, to make room for the new ones."

Evernote link
The courts could go a bit easy on small potato crimes.
Here in NL one can be sentenced to an x number of hours mandatory community service instead of jail time for minor crimes. Especially with first time offenders.
That has several advantages, one of them is less inmates and that way enough room for serious perpetrators.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: Essence Lumin

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
21,817
SLU Posts
18459
The courts could go a bit easy on small potato crimes.
Here in NL one can be sentenced to an x number of hours mandatory community service instead of jail time for minor crimes. Especially with first time offenders.
That has several advantages, one of them is less inmates and that way enough room for serious perpetrators.
It's not really a problem that people are being sent to prison for minor offences. Rather, the problem is that, when they do something that certainly merits some sort of prison sentence, they get sentenced to a year when somewhere else they might get six months, or three years when elsewhere they might get only one.

No one would disagree that you need to people who persistently commit domestic burglaries to prison sooner or later -- not the first time, perhaps, and possibly not the second, but certainly after the third offence it's not unreasonable to send the offender to prison. However, one might question whether it's necessary to award a sentence of at least three years, which is what courts are currently required to, when not so long ago they'd have probably have given him 18 months or 2 years.

That's the problem -- it's very easy, when the public are rightly concerned about the possibility of being burgled, to announce you'll legislate to ensure burglars get longer sentences, in the hope that'll deter them -- which makes me wonder if many MPs have ever actually met an habitual domestic burglar (probably not) -- if you don't then increase the number of beds available in prisons to cope with the increased demand, sooner or later you hit the sort of problems we're now seeing.
That's very oversimplified, obviously -- the Prison Service has faced huge cuts in expenditure over the last 13 years, which means more and more cells have to be taken out of service because they're not properly maintained, for example -- but it broadly what's happening.
 
  • 1Thanks
Reactions: Sid

Sid

I never said that.
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
6,849
House arrests with electronic tagging (above the ankle) for certain convicted criminals could be a possibility too. That is used here too in the last years for long time sentenced criminals, so that they can get used to a life outside of the jail again step by step. And it makes room in jail houses as well.
For instance a 10 years sentence could mean 5 years in jail, 2.5 years house arrest in ones own home with ankle tagging and 2.5 years sentence reduction for good behavior (if so). Of course not possible for every inmate. It all depends on character and the kind of committed crime.
During the house arrest period there are training programs for reintegration in society. Even a job is a possibility for some.
 
  • 1Thanks
Reactions: Innula Zenovka

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
21,817
SLU Posts
18459
House arrests with electronic tagging (above the ankle) for certain convicted criminals could be a possibility too. That is used here too in the last years for long time sentenced criminals, so that they can get used to a life outside of the jail again step by step. And it makes room in jail houses as well.
For instance a 10 years sentence could mean 5 years in jail, 2.5 years house arrest in ones own home with ankle tagging and 2.5 years sentence reduction for good behavior (if so). Of course not possible for every inmate. It all depends on character and the kind of committed crime.
During the house arrest period there are training programs for reintegration in society. Even a job is a possibility for some.
We have electronic tagging, too, but only for a maximum of six months. That could certainly be used more extensively, but that would involve greatly expanding the Probation Service which, like the Prison Service and the rest of the criminal justice system and law enforcement generally, has suffered very large spending cuts over the last 13 years.

I'm a member of the Labour Party, so obviously I am no friend of the Conservatives, but I think everyone -- including most Conservatives other than members of the Government itself -- agrees that 13 years of "austerity" have done terrible damage to vital public services. And the criminal justice system, law enforcement, and the prison and probation services have suffered more than most.
 
  • 1Thanks
Reactions: Sid

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
21,817
SLU Posts
18459

Evernote link

The number of people jailed in England and Wales has hit an all-time high, as ministers consider releasing prisoners early in a scramble for ways to avoid running out of prison spaces.

There are just 557 spaces left across the entire prison estate, with that number thought to be significantly lower in men’s jails, which also includes spots in Category D “open prisons”, for which most prisoners are not eligible.

The male prison population has grown by 192 in a week to hit 88,604, Ministry of Justice figures published on Friday show. It grew by 211 the previous week, when there were reported to be just 150 spaces remaining.
 
  • 1Facepalm
Reactions: Govi

Casey Pelous

Senior Discount
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 24, 2018
Messages
2,187
Location
USA, upper left corner
SL Rez
2007
Joined SLU
February, 2011
SLU Posts
10461
The courts could go a bit easy on small potato crimes.
Here in NL one can be sentenced to an x number of hours mandatory community service instead of jail time for minor crimes. Especially with first time offenders.
That has several advantages, one of them is less inmates and that way enough room for serious perpetrators.
House arrests with electronic tagging (above the ankle) for certain convicted criminals could be a possibility too. That is used here too in the last years for long time sentenced criminals, so that they can get used to a life outside of the jail again step by step. And it makes room in jail houses as well.
For instance a 10 years sentence could mean 5 years in jail, 2.5 years house arrest in ones own home with ankle tagging and 2.5 years sentence reduction for good behavior (if so). Of course not possible for every inmate. It all depends on character and the kind of committed crime.
During the house arrest period there are training programs for reintegration in society. Even a job is a possibility for some.
Just so you know we're not 100% savages, Sid, we do those things here, too.

(And yet, we still manage to have more people per capita in prison than any other "developed" country." Hey! USA #1! :cheer: )



* Yes, I realize this is a really tricky term. The competition is El Salvador, Rwanda, Turkmenistan, American Samoa (?!), and Cuba.
 
  • 2Thanks
Reactions: Govi and Sid

detrius

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
1,998
Location
Land of bread, beer and BMW.
Joined SLU
09-30-2007
SLU Posts
10065
I predict that the conservative approach to this issue will eventually condense to a combination of the following policies:
  • Bring back the death penalty!
  • Establish prison colonies! Like Australia!!
  • Build private prisons!
 
  • 1Sad
  • 1Thanks
Reactions: Govi and Innula Zenovka

Bartholomew Gallacher

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
6,101
SL Rez
2002
The SNP lost two seats in the HoC to Labour in by-elections. Many commentators do see now the SNP in the beginning of its decline, therefore also a possible indepedence of Scotland fading away.

 
Last edited:
  • 1Thanks
Reactions: Govi

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
21,817
SLU Posts
18459
The SNP lost two seats in the HoC to Labour in by-elections. Many commentators do see now the SNP in the beginning of its decline, therefore also a possible indepedence of Scotland fading away.

It's a single constituency called "Rutherglen and Hamilton West" that compromises two neighbouring districts, so only one by-election.

The SNP did, though, also lose a second Westminster seat to the Conservatives last week, when the MP for The MP for East Kilbride, Strathaven and Lesmahagow (again, a single constituency, despite the name), Dr Lisa Cameron, defected to the Conservatives over what she describes as bullying by her colleagues.

 
Last edited:
  • 1Thanks
Reactions: Govi

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
21,817
SLU Posts
18459

Somehow, after our experience of Brexit, I don't think we'll be seeing Hexit any time soon.
 
  • 1Agree
Reactions: Govi

Sid

I never said that.
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
6,849
Hungary and Poland are two perfect examples why the EU should not be used to free Eastern European countries from the claws of Russia.
Their perception and tradition of freedom and democracy and their cultural values are way too far apart from the standards of the rest of the EU.
The same will happen when Ukraine will become member at the first possible moment.

The EU should not be a political shelter, but a union of like-minded members IMHO.
Same goes for NATO.