I think I’m missing some nuance in this latest exchange, which isn’t uncommon because I’m not well versed in American politics.
I’ve had to hold my nose and vote for the lesser of two evils before, but I never felt I had to hide the fact that’s what I was doing. I could freely and openly discuss all the reasons I don’t like X along with all the reasons why I am voting for them anyway.
Is that not all Cristalle is trying to say?
Let's play pretend.
Let's say, 2020 being the year it is, the Democrats fully embraced the crazy and nominated not Biden, but a rock.
So, now we're getting ready to vote for a rock. I mean, it's a rock! What were we thinking?! But it's not Trump, so oh yes Jesus we're gonna vote for it. Between Trump and a rock, the rock wins, no contest.
Meanwhile, there are people posting about how the rock is porous. The rock has been thrown at people in the past, so it's dangerous. The rock was often used to trip people up, and - being a rock - has little of what could be really called a progressive history. It usually just sat there, like a....like a rock.
Do they think they're educating us on WHAT A FUCKING ROCK IS? The rock certainly wasn't *our* first choice. Hell, around these parts, it wasn't anyone's 198th choice. Why, you ask? Why weren't we rock supporters from the start? Well, I imagine it's for some or maybe all the reasons those people keep linking to. But as a party, the rock is what we chose. So: ROCK 2020.
Meanwhile, people keep posting links showing how the rock is igneous, or more shale than anything else. And we keep asking, what is the point?
Play time over.